|
Red Lake tribal finances:
what’s the rest of the story?
by Clara
NiiSka
During its regularly scheduled October
9,
2001 meeting, the
Red Lake tribal council narrowly enacted an ordinance providing for the
recall
of tribal council representatives and officers. As
Press/ON reported on October 12, the #1 concern
motivating the recall ordinance was, “the way that Red Lake treasurer
Dan King
has handled tribal business.”
Dan King, perhaps in response to
rising
community concerns
about the financial situation at Red Lake, published an “October 2001
edition” Tribal
Financial Report—a full-color glossy brochure which reportedly cost
$6,500
to print, and more than a thousand dollars to mail.
The brochure was apparently mailed shortly after the
Tuesday,
October 9th tribal council meeting.
Dan King also joined with tribal
council
representatives
Fabian “Nickel” Cook, Al Pemberton, Harlan Beaulieu, and Delores Lasley
in
circulating a flyer, “Negative rumors attempt to undermine gaming
efforts.” That flyer includes a number
of statements about tribal council finances, as well as sharp criticism
of
alleged “political posturing” by tribal secretary Judy Roy. (Judy Roy introduced the Removal Ordinance
and moved for a resolution adopting it, and voted for the Removal
Ordinance at
the tribal council meeting.)
This writer read the financial report
and
the ‘negative
rumors’ flyer, then contacted tribal council treasurer Dan King at the
phone
number given on the financial report, (218) 679-3341, hoping to get
clear
answers to several questions raised by the tribal council treasurer’s
presentation of Red Lake financial information. The
report lists historic assets, but it does not list
liabilities. It lists historic
revenues, but it does not list expenditures. The
report does not show the tenfold increase in debts
incurred by the
tribal council, from $4 million to over $40 million, since Dan King
took office
in 1998.
On page 6 of his report, the tribal
council
treasurer
published a chart about “tribal cash status.” Most
of the cash reported deals with claims-settlement
funds, and it is
unclear whether or not most of the $16.5 that he describes as
“available for
tribal purposes” is actually restricted money. Furthermore,
there are some potential legal challenges
which could made
against the current settlement agreement, which could further restrict
the
availability of funds to the tribal council. What
the cash status report actually does indicate is that
there has
been a spend-down on tribal cash reserves, and also in trust funds,
during
King’s tenure as tribal council treasurer.
In addition, on page 8 the report
lists
“tribal budgets” for
the years 2000 and 2001, but does not show actual expenditures for the
year
2000, nor does it show expenditures for the first six months of 2001. The chart on the same page is also
misleading, because it does not make it clear exactly what “net profit”
consists of, nor where that money went during the year 2000. The most effective way to get a clear and
accurate picture of the financial status of any organization is through
audited
financial statements. Press/ON
has requested such audited financial statements from Red Lake tribal
council
treasurer Dan King on several occasions, but he has not made them
available.
In his report, the tribal council
treasurer
claims that the
federal government “is legally required to provide for basic needs and
support
services” at Red Lake based on “Treaty Agreements.”
This writer asked Dan King exactly what treaty
provisions
he was
referring to. King refused to answer
the question.
A report which honestly detailed the
present
financial
status of the Red Lake Band would have looked more like a bank’s loan
application than a glossy public-relations promotional brochure:
detailing
income and expenses, assets and liability. (Assets minus liabilities are generally
assumed to be the “net worth” of an organization. For a number of
reasons
including that for all practical purposes the land at Red Lake cannot
legally
be mortgaged or sold, the land, lakes, and forests should not be
included as
“assets” in accounting for “net worth” on a financial statement.)
When asked for information to fill in
some
of the huge gaps
in his financial report, Dan King categorically refused to answer any
of this
writer’s questions. “Are you actually
going to print it,” he asked. When
assured that the reason Press/ON contacted him was to get his
side of
the story, the tribal council treasurer accused Press/ON
publisher Bill
Lawrence of journalistic bias because he is “related to Judy Roy,” the
tribal
council secretary and target of a number of allegations made by Dan
King. After repeating his accusations and
arguing
that, “Bill is the editor, and will have the final say,” Dan King said
that he
would “present” further financial information on his own. “I do not
want it
filtered,” he said. He then abruptly
hung up the phone.
This writer observes that I am
respectful of
the fact that
Bill Lawrence does in fact own The Native American Press/Ojibwe News,
and of his skill in pinpointing critical questions in an investigative
news
story. But, even though there have been
a few times when I and the publisher have disagreed on something in a
story
with my byline, Bill Lawrence has never censored my articles.
Press/ON has a number of
unanswered
questions
relating to Dan King’s financial reports. Since
he has offered to publicly ‘fill in the gaps’ in his
financial
report, here are a few of those questions:
·
How
much, exactly, is the
outstanding debt for the casino
expansion and other construction projects, and how much will be owed in
interest? Provide a full accounting of
the development costs, and the debt outstanding. What
are the monthly payments, and how do these compare with the
actual income from each casino? Detail
the monthly expenses—overhead, debt repayment, overhead, wages, and
other
costs—for the River Road casino since the water-slide and other
expansions were
opened on May 25th. Also,
detail the monthly income, motel occupancy rates, water-slide usage,
and
restaurant and gift shop revenues. How
have the new ‘developments’ have increased gambling revenues at the
casino? How does actual business
compare with the business plans which were used to justify the casino
expansion?
·
Exactly
how many employees are there at each
casino? How many are Red Lake enrollees? What is their average monthly pay?
·
Detail
the total debt of the Red
Lake Band of Chippewa
Indians. What is the collateral which
guarantees this debt? What is the present
total net worth—in detail.
·
What,
precisely, is the present
‘return’ on the tribal
council’s investment in the casinos and River Road expansion? Is the casino earning enough money to pay
all the bills? (Claiming that there
will be a “per capita payment in the near future” does not answer that
question—and it is not clear whether “near future” is being calculated
using
‘Indian time’ or ‘BIA time.’)
·
There
have been allegations of bid
rigging and kickbacks
in the River Road casino construction. Provide
a list of all of the bids relating to the
casino
expansion. Also, detail the involvement
of Red Lake Builders in casino construction. Provide
a full and complete account of actual construction
costs and
amounts still owed.
·
The
recent financial report
indiscriminately combines a
number of “tribal revenue sources,” including federal, state and county
funds
for “need based” programs administered through the tribal council. Detail exactly what this includes—and
the corresponding costs and other expenses.
·
Both the
“Tribal Financial Report”
and the ‘negative
rumors’ flyer refer to housing: $39 million dollars worth of housing
since
1998, in addition to the Walking Shield program. List
the programs, the sources of funds, the status of each
project, and the number of units provided. How
many are complete and in livable condition?
· In
recent the ‘negative rumors’
flyer, it is claimed that
the Jourdain-Perpich Elder Car Center is “showing a profit.” Provide a line-item budget.
Are any services to elders being cut, in
order to make a profit?
As tribal council treasurer and chief
executive in charge of
development for the River Road casino expansion project, Press/ON
believes that Dan King should have no difficulty answering these
questions. Press/ON welcomes the
opportunity to publicly clarify issues of concern to many people at Red
Lake.
|