
For nine years, my brother and I
were political prisoners, along with the other Ahnishinahbæótjibway
children of our generation. We were
forcibly removed from our community and our relatives, and confined to
the
grounds of a prison within a concentration camp, the Federally mandated
compulsory-education schools. We could
not leave the school, on penalty of being beaten or chloroformed if we
were
caught.
My grandfather Bah-wah-we-nind, who
had protected us, died the spring before we were taken away and put
into the
boarding school. My brother, who was
younger than I was, did not understand that my grandfather was really
dead. He wanted to go see my
grandfather. He kept asking, and
asking, to go see my grandfather. Since
we were not allowed to leave the school grounds, we ran away, and went
to the
log house that had been my grandfather's.
Three times that first winter my
brother and I were at the school, we went through the woods that were
there at
that time, thick jack-pine and white pine and Norway pines, the virgin
forest
that still stood between St. Mary's Mission school and my grandfather's
house
in Ba-kwa-kwan. We stood at the gate to
my grandfather's horse pasture. Just
west of the gate, there were the graves of my great-grandfather and
great-grandmother,
and a number of my other relatives.
My brother and I stood in the snow
at my grandfather's gate, and looked at the log house where he had once
lived. The house was empty.
The snow lay thick, there were no tracks in
the yard, and no smoke came out of the chimney. My
brother was hoping so hard that my grandfather would be there,
but he was not there. I kept telling my
brother, "He's dead, he's gone, and he's not coming back."
My brother was too young to really
understand at first. The Métis
would
not tell us where my grandfather had been buried, and I could not take
my
brother to his grave.
He was just a little guy, five years
old. The last time we went to my
grandfather's house, a neighbor saw us walking along the road. "Where are you kids going," he asked
us in Ahnishinahbæótjibway.
We had to answer in English, because we had been beaten so many
times
and had our mouths washed out with soap for speaking our language at
the
school, that we didn't dare speak our own language.
He knew that we had been looking for our grandfather. He just came over and buttoned up the little
thin coat that my brother had on, and hugged my brother.
He said, "it's better that you go back
to the school," because he knew what would happen if we were caught
away
from the school. My brother and I went
back to the school, and he was crying all the way.
Our mother had died when my brother was still a baby, and our
father was in the tuberculosis sanatorium at Ah-gwah-ching. Because of the compulsory-education laws
unilaterally passed by the United States, our surviving relatives could
not
keep us, and we had to go back to the school.
The United States Government had
justified the compulsory-education laws to the general public by saying
they
wanted to civilize us. One of the
formulators of Indian policy, Dr. Lyman Abbott, stated in his paper,
"Education for the Indian:"[i]
Schools are less expensive than war. It
costs less to educate an Indian than it
does to shoot him. A long and costly
experience demonstrated that fact.
One
of the goals of
the boarding schools was to change the identity of Ahnishinahbæótjibway
and other Aboriginal Indigenous children into that of Indian. We had the sloganized definitions of
ourselves, "dirty Indians," "little savages," and the
"vanishing Americans," continually drummed into our ears in the
classroom. We have never been either
Indians or "Americans." The
agenda of the compulsory education schools was genocide: directly
through the
hundreds of children who died at the school or who were infected with
tuberculosis there; and by changing the identity of the survivors into
Indians. The schools were prisons,
filled with human rights violations against defenseless young children.
Compulsory education of Ahnishinahbæótjibway
children is specifically designed to obliterate our identity, our
culture, and
our existence as a Sovereign people.
When the compulsory-education laws were being formulated in the
1880's
and 1890's, they were presented to the policy-makers at the Lake Mohonk
Conference as the only viable alternative:[ii]
The method of the first--unhesitatingly, unblushingly
avowed--is extermination. I have myself
been met, when expostulating with one of these assassins, with the
indignant
retort, "You would not spare the young of the rattlesnake, would
you?" He had declared that he
would clear the reptiles out, root and branch; that the squaws were
worse and
more barbarous than the bucks, and he would destroy even the papooses.
... It
is much to be regretted that a weak sentimentality should lead true
friends of
the aborigines to listen rather to the chiefs than to those who
consider the
real advantage of the whole tribe, and, indeed, the interests of
civilization. That the cause of peace
and quietness, the progress of Christian settlement across the
continent, and
in short the welfare of the white races are involved in the permanent
absorption of all the tribes into the American nation, is, perhaps, a
generally
recognized fact.
The
"welfare
of the white races," who are immigrants illegally here, was promoted by
compulsory education, a less bloody form of extermination. As Mr. Townsend, a Métis student of the
Carlisle Indian School, told the Lake Mohonk policy-makers:[iii]
I believe in education, because I believe it will kill
the Indian that is in me, and leave the man and the citizen. ... I
believe in
the Indian learning the English language: one people, one language,
that is my
idea. I contradict the statement that
the only good Indian is a dead Indian.
The only good Indian is an educated Indian.
My grandfather, born in the 1850's,
had not been brainwashed by education.
My father's generation was the first at Red Lake to be put
through the
pulverizing machine of compulsory education.
The contrast between these two men of my childhood:
Bah-wah-we-nind, my
grandfather, and my father, was the consequence of compulsory education. My grandfather was a tower of strength, a
man whose heart was filled with compassionate love, although he had
been
imprisoned for sixty years in this concentration camp called Red Lake
Reservation, although he had witnessed and been powerless to prevent
the
Holocaust of the Ahnishinahbæótjibway,
including most of his
family the Bear Dodem.
My father was among the few Ahnishinahbæótjibway
men of his generation who had survived the most brutal first phase of
compulsory boarding-school education, and it had shattered him. He tried to live within the Indian
identity
that was forced onto him in the boarding schools, and his spirit was
broken. He died at the age of 38, from
the tuberculosis which was brought into our community.
Tuberculosis was genocide. At the
Lake Mohonk Conference of 1890, it
was said:[iv]
The full-blood Indians [sic] have less endurance
than the half or mixed-bloods; and when attacked by tuberculosis or any
form of
scrofula, they perish more quickly. ...
The well-attested fact that consumption is the scourge of the Indian [sic]
in the climate of Dakota, where pulmonary diseases among whites are
almost
unknown, points conclusively to the fact that there has been and
is that, in
the peculiar conditions of Indian [sic] life, which engenders
the
disease. ...
The more thoroughly
the contagious nature of tuberculosis is established, the more terrible
the
present condition of the Indian appears.
It is stated on good authority that tuberculous cattle are
constantly
sold to and consumed by the Indians [sic]. Their
only hope is in a common knowledge of every-day affairs,
which shall protect them from their enemy, the unscrupulous white man
...
St. Mary's Catholic Mission School
was a contract school, funded by United States appropriations out of
trust
funds generated by the illegal sale of Ahnishinahbæótjibway
lands, and except for the great emphasis on Roman Catholic dogma, was
not much
different from the United States Government Indian schools.
The physical conditions of the
boarding schools are preserved in documents:
Conditions at these schools with respect to medical
attention,
housing, and sanitation leave much to be desired. The
general death rate is ordinarily accepted as the best single
index of the social wellbeing of a people.
As pointed out elsewhere in this report the statistics for the
Indians
are incomplete and more or less unreliable, and the published death
rates for
Indians are in many cases obviously understatements of the true
conditions. The existing figures,
unreliable as they
are, indicate, however, a high general death rate with all that
connotes of
suffering both physical and emotional ...[v] The labor
of children as carried on in the
Indian boarding schools would, it is believed, constitute a
violation of child
labor laws in most states ...[vi] Old buildings, often kept in use long after
they should have been pulled down, and admittedly bad fire-risks in
many
instances; crowded dormitories; conditions of sanitation ...
certainly below
accepted standards; boilers and machinery out-of-date and in some
instances
unsafe, to the point of having long since been condemned, but never
replaced;
many medical officers who are of low standards of training and
relatively
unacquainted with the methods of modern medicine, to say nothing of
health
education for the children; lack of milk sufficient to give children
anything
like the official "standard" of a quart per child per day, almost
none of the fresh fruits and vegetables ... the serious malnutrition,
due to
the lack of food and use of the wrong foods; schoolrooms seldom
showing
knowledge of modern principles of lighting and ventilating; lack of
recreational opportunities... an abnormally long day, which cuts
to a
dangerous point the normal allowance for sleep and rest ... the
generally
routinized nature of the institutional life ... its annihilation of
initiative,
its lack of beauty, its almost complete negation of normal family life,
all of
which have disastrous effects upon mental health ...[vii]
In 1928, the Brookings Institute
considered it necessary to ask the question, "Can the Indian be
'Educated'?" The authors
answered:
It is necessary at this point to consider one question
that is always raised in connection with an educational program for
Indians: Is
it really worth while to do anything for Indians, or are they an
"inferior" race? Can the
Indian be "educated"?
The question as usually asked implies, it
should be noted, the restricted notion of education as mere formal
schooling against
which caution has already been pronounced; but whether schooling of the
intellectual type is meant or education in the broader sense of
desirable
individual and social changes, the answer can be given unequivocally: The
Indian is essentially capable of education.[viii] ... The
real goals of education are not
"reading, writing, and arithmetic"--not even teaching Indians to
speak English, though that is important, but ... good citizenship in
the sense
of an understanding participation in community life, ability to earn
one's own
living honesty and efficiently in a socially worthwhile vocation,
comfortable
and desirable home and family life, and good character.[ix]
In 1929, the Brookings Institute
recommended re-organization, and expansion of the Bureau of Indian
Affairs as
the solution for the abysmal conditions in the schools which the Meriam
staff
documented, although when I entered St. Mary's Mission School at Red
Lake, the
conditions at that school had not changed from those documented six
years
earlier. Forty-eight years later, in
1977, the United States Congress reported, in the Final Report of the
American
Indian Policy Review Commission:
INDIAN READINESS.
What could be the decisive factor in determining national Indian
policy
is the state of readiness of the Indian population.
Many negative conditions still prevail: Educational levels are
still much too low; the delivery of health services is grossly
inadequate;
wretched housing breeds health problems and social ills; unemployment
rates
greatly exceed local and national averages. ...[x]
a position little better than that which he enjoyed in 1928 when the
Meriam
Report was issued.[xi]
The
United States
Congress' recommendations in 1977 did not differ in substance from
those made
in 1928. The main departure from the
policies of the previous century was that, although the Bureau of
Indian
Affairs was to be, yet again, restructured, re-organized, and
re-entrenched,
the expansion in this new round of reform focused on the Tribal
Governments
created and controlled by the Bureau of Indian Affairs under the 1934
Indian
Reorganization Act, rather than with direct and clear-cut lines of
accountability through the explicitly federal agency of the B.I.A. The Europeans say, "the more things
change, the more they remain the same."
In 1994, Ahnishinahbæótjibway
children still get an
abusive, culture-destroying and personally damaging compulsory
education.
In 1887, the policy-makers of the
Lake Mohonk Conference of Friends of the Indian referred to the
"complicated and expensive machine which, under the general name of
'our
Indian policy,' we have been running these two hundred and odd years."[xii] Professor Painter, who made these remarks,
saw the seamless continuity between the British and American Indian
Policy. Because the treaties on which
the United States' claim to land rested on the assent of European
subject
peoples, the participants at Lake Mohonk did not refer, except
indirectly, to
the two distinct peoples combined into the artificial category of
Indian. Some of the code-words were
"civilized
Indians," "advanced Indians," "Christian Indians," vs.
"blanket Indians," "pagan Indians," and "Indian
animal." The difference between
the policy applied to the European subject Métis people and to
Aboriginal
Indigenous people may not have been clearly and explicitly enunciated
in
publicly distributed documents, but it was and is there.
The Reservation schools at Red Lake
operated simultaneously as boarding schools and as day schools. Ahnishinahbæótjibway
children at Red Lake were, over the course of two generations, forcibly
removed
from our families and held prisoner at the school.
The Métis children, particularly those of the leading
families,
went to day school, at the same school.
These children attended classes during the day, but did not
participate
in the labor at school (manual training) that we were forced to perform. They went home at night to their
families. These Métis children were
not
beaten for speaking languages other than English (for example French
and the
hierarchical Creole language of Chippewa).
The United States Government
policies which created the compulsory-education schools as a tool
of cultural
annihilation were formulated at a time when the question of whether
Indians
were closer to what the White policy-makers called the "half-brain"
race of the Negroes, or the "full-brain" Aryans, was somberly
considered and discussed. The
long-range agenda was, as explained by Senator Dawes in 1890:[xiii]
The census will, I think, reveal some startling facts in
regard to the Indians. We have been
under the impression for the last twenty-five years that the Indian has
been
increasing. That, I think, will appear
not to be true for the last ten years.
The aggregate will fall, I am informed, considerably short of
what it
was in 1880. The loss is mostly
confined to the full bloods. Mixed
bloods hold their own better, and are increasing in this land.
The Indian people will not remain as a
separate race among us, as the black race must. The
figures show where he is going. He is to
disappear in the midst of our population, be absorbed
in it, and be one of us and fade out of sight as an Indian. So you must administer the Indian Bureau
with that in mind. ... Their blood,
their sinew, their strength are needed, and will help us.
I was taken to St. Mary's Catholic
Mission School at Red Lake in the Fall of 1935 as an orphan, although
my father
was still living, incarcerated at the Ah-gwah-ching tuberculosis asylum. During that summer, my brother and I had
worked hanging fish-nets for our relatives, standing on fish-boxes to
reach the
net-racks where nets are untangled and dried.
We had earned enough money, hanging nets, to buy ourselves new
clothes
with which to start school.
All of the compulsory education
boarding schools at that time were run on a military basis. The nuns took our clothes, and all the rest
of our personal possessions away from us.
In the Western European way of thinking, this standard military
procedure was done to depersonalize us, and regiment us into following
their
commands. They issued us old,
patched-up clothes which had been donated to the Mission.
(Old, worn-out, useless clothes are still
sent by the truckload to Indian Reservations.
The Catholic Missions solicited donations, and then sorted
through
them. The nice clothes were, and still
are, sold to the community at a thrift store run by the Mission. The unsalable clothing was patched, and used
to clothe the children in the boarding school.) Each
week, we were allowed to bathe, and were issued a different
set of clothing. There was no place in
the dormitory for a change of clothing, nor any other personal
possessions. We didn't have a locker,
nor any other place that was our own private space.
Our only personal possession was a toothbrush, hanging in a
numbered spot on a communal rack, but since most of the children at the
boarding school could neither count nor read, others used our
toothbrushes.
The girls' dormitory still stands at
the St. Mary's Mission Grounds just west of Redlake.
The boys' dormitory was torn down in the 1970's, and the
Government boarding schools were burned to the ground.
The boys' dormitory was a two-story building,
with the sleeping quarters on the top floor, and the shop, library,
matron's workroom,
playroom, and reading room on the first floor.
There was a wood-working shop, and showers and toilets in the
basement. The sleeping-quarters
consisted of a large room, with about sixty children sleeping in old
G.I.-issue
steel army cots, arranged in rows. The
beds were close together, and we slept alternating heads and feet. There was also a sickroom with three beds,
the Prefect's quarters (I never went in there, so I don't know what it
looked
like), and there were about twenty beds in a separate room for children
who wet
the bed. The mattresses in this room
were straw-ticks, rotted from urine.
There were four big statues in the boy's dormitory, including
one of Jesus
nailed to the Cross. The Prefect was
always praying to the statues, going from one end of the room to the
other.
The dormitories were cleaned on the
Army system. We had an ample supply of
sawdust, because our forests were being cut.
We would dampen the sawdust, and use it to sweep the floors. Every morning, after breakfast, a bucket was
passed from child to child, and we mopped up around and under our beds.
Many dormitories, especially those occupied by boys, are
not provided with night toilets on the upper floors.[xiv]
In
the corner of
the dormitory, there were two big washtubs for the boys to piss in
during the
night. Every morning, they were
full. Two of the boys had to carry them
outside. Children were assigned to
different projects: to clean out the toilets downstairs, to mop down
the
stairways, shovel snow, haul wood, whatever needed to be done--like the
Army.
Most of the staff at St. Mary's
Mission School, including the Priests and Nuns, were Germans. They and the hired help spoke German, except
the French barn boss, who spoke a French Creole. The
Priest spoke Latin when he was saying Mass, and the Nuns
spoke English in the classrooms. The
whole thing was foreign: Western European history, religion, and
languages. The only thing that we were
taught about ourselves was that everything Ahnishinahbæótjibway--our
families, our culture, our language--would be destroyed, completely
annihilated
from Grandmother Earth and from Grandfather Midé.
We were awakened by a bell, at six
o'clock in the morning.
Facilities for washing face and hands are often of the
trough type. In some places the water
is obtained through spigots and in some through a perforated pipe
controlled by
a master valve.[xv]
There
was a trough,
with a pipe with holes drilled in it, for the water.
We washed in cold water, with small pieces of soap donated to
the
Mission, or with G.I. soap.
At six-thirty, we were lined up and
marched to Mass, which was celebrated in Latin, and then the Priest
would give
a sermon. Father Simon gave sermons in
two hierarchical languages, English and Chippewa Creole, which he
deluded
himself into thinking was the language of the Ahnishinahbæótjibway. Like everything else that was told to us in
school, what Father Simon said didn't make any sense to those of us who
understood the Ahnishinahbæótjibway
language. We didn't dare repeat what he
had said in
Chippewa, nor discuss it, because we would get a beating for not
speaking
English. Father Simon's sermons were
fire-and-brimstone. He would castigate
the "Pagans across the lake," and would castigate the Ahnishinahbæótjibway
and our Dodems, particularly those of the relatively intact
community in
Ponemah. Then, he would shout that the
Protestants were pagans, and were going to Hell. The
Catholics were the only true believers, the priests preached
to us, "Catholicism was the only true religion of Jesus Christ." When he gave a sermon, Father Simon would
scream and wave his arms like Hitler giving a political speech, and his
face
would get so red that we thought he might blow a blood vessel. After Mass, we had breakfast--mush, and
after "policing" the dormitory, we were marched to classes. We spent a lot of time learning catechism.
When I first went into the Catholic
Mission School, there was Jesus Christ strung up on a cross right in
the
classrooms. It was a terrifying experience
for Ahnishinahbæótjibway children from
a non-violent culture,
to see them killing a man like that and then entertaining themselves
with the
enthusiastic telling and re-telling of this abomination.
In our Catechism classes, the nuns told us
every gory detail--spitting on Him, beating Him, making Him carry His
cross. The Nuns added on, describing
the way that one or two men held a plank across Jesus' head, and
somebody
leaned on it to make the crown of thorns go into His head.
They enjoyed telling how He was beaten. They
told how the blood ran out, how bloody
He was, and I said to myself, "Wow!
What kind of people are these?"
They scared me. I still have
nightmares about this gruesome violence.
When I was stationed in Bamberg, Germany, I went to see the
Passion
Play, which brought back memories of my revulsion toward the Christian
religion's fascination with violent death.
There were two grades in each
classroom, and also there was a two-tiered instructional agenda: one
curriculum
for the Métis, and another for the Ahnishinahbæótjibway
children. At that time, it was
scientific knowledge that the I.Q. of Aboriginal Indigenous children
was around
70, another example of science operating in a positive feedback loop
with a
social engineering agenda. The I.Q.
tests were given in English, which we did not understand, and we were
evaluated
on our ability to reason in a linear, compartmentalized way which is
inimical
to Ahnishinahbæótjibway thinking. We were treated as though we were stupid; as
though we were
incapable of learning to read or write, and many of us internalized
this
definition of ourselves. The Métis
children, particularly the light-skinned ones, were favored by the
teachers,
and some of them went on to higher education.
The children were fed a
high-carbohydrate diet: lots of white bread with flour-gravy, and
occasionally
beets (which are a European crop). The
survivors of Indian Boarding Schools have terrible teeth, and other
health
problems including diabetes, from the boarding-school diet.[xvi]
The dictionary definition of
discipline includes, "religious mortification or punishment, ...
punishment inflicted by way of correction and training ... to bring to
a state
of order and obedience by training and control."[xvii] Ahnishinahbæótjibway
social
controls worked because each individual valued the harmony of our
society, and
took responsibility for the consequences of their own actions. Creating a centralized father figure who
maintained order through violence, and then blaming him when things go
wrong,
is a kind of social organization which Ahnishinahbæótjibway
see as irresponsible.
The violent discipline to which Ahnishinahbæótjibway
children were subjected in the boarding schools was intended to launch
cycles
of violence within our families through the generations, destroy our Dodems
and our autonomous social controls, and create the need for an external
police-state. The Meriam Report
touched very briefly on the violent military discipline in the
boarding-schools:
The discipline in the boarding schools is restrictive
rather than developmental....[xviii] The methods practiced in disciplining
children are often unwise....[xix] Nearly every boarding school visited
furnished disquieting illustrations of failure to understand the
underlying
principles of human behavior.
Punishments of the most harmful sort are bestowed in sheer
ignorance,
often in a sincere attempt to be of help ...[xx]
Ahnishinahbæótjibway
children were
forbidden to speak our own native language.
The Nuns and the Prefect carried a clip-board with all our names
on it,
and during the day they kept track of all of our infractions of school
rules,
including saying a single word of Ahnishinahbæótjibway. We had to be in bed by ten o'clock at
night. The lights were turned off, and
then in a few minutes, they were turned on again. The
Prefect would go down the rows of beds in the dormitory.
We never knew at whose bed he was going to
stop. He would turn down the blanket,
and take his strap to us as we lay in our beds, and beat us. We were never told why we were being
punished. Other discipline included
"running the gauntlet," in which the child to be punished had to go
between two lines of children, and the children in the lines had to
kick and
hit the child who was running. If the
Prefect thought that the child had not been hit enough, they would make
them
run through again, or single out those of us who had not hit and
kicked, and
make us beat on them. Discipline at the
U.S. Government and Mission Schools also included chloroforming
children. The smell of chloroform and
ether still
haunt me.
The purpose of the Boarding Schools
for the Ahnishinahbæótjibway children
was, according to U.S.
Government documents[xxi],
to destroy our community and our culture.
There were Métis children at St. Mary's Mission school
from Pine Point,
Leech Lake, White Earth, White Oak Point, and other places who were
boarders,
but the Métis children from Red Lake were day-school students. The Chippewa Indian boarding students were
already Christians with European values.
They were treated differently than the Ahnishinahbæótjibway,
and many of them were tracked into a high-school education. The B.I.A. educated some of them to be
Indian community leaders, and also used them as a smokescreen to divert
public
attention away from the genocide which was directed toward the Ahnishinahbæótjibway
children. This is part of the larger
pattern of the U.S. Government's relationship with their Chippewa
Indians.
The Ahnishinahbæótjibway
children were kept isolated from the community, although the parents of
some of
them were allowed to visit on weekends.
We had to stay on the school grounds.
My brother and I used to sit at the edge of the school grounds,
and
watch people walking along what was then a gravel road, and the teams
of horses
and cars that occasionally went by. We
knew every car on the Reservation, and could recognize them at a great
distance. One of the things we noticed:
when a person came to work for the Bureau at Red Lake, they started
their term
of employment driving an old car, but it didn't take long until they
were
driving a brand-new car.
We had to go to every church
service, except funerals. We were not
allowed to go to funerals, and we did not dare go close enough to the
church to
find out who had died. About once a
week, a child died at St. Mary's. These
deaths were obscured from us. We were
marched out of the building until the body was removed.
Whenever anybody disappeared, we were told,
"they went home." Hundreds
and hundreds of children, from Red Lake and from other communities,
must have
died during the years that the Mission School was a boarding school. Many more of our people died from diseases
or abuse contracted in the Boarding Schools at Red Lake.
General Thomas Morgan explained to
the Lake Mohonk Conference in 1889:
Whatever steps are necessary should be taken to place
these children under proper educational influences.
If under any circumstances compulsory education is justifiable,
it certainly is in this case.
Education, in the broad sense in which it is here used, is the
Indian's
only salvation.... Education should seek the disintegration of the
tribes.
[i].Reverend
Lyman Abbott, D.D., "Education for the
Indian," keynote address, Lake Mohonk Conference of 1888.
[ii].Proceedings
of the Lake Mohonk Conference, October 12, 1886, from a paper read by
Mr.
Philip C. Garrett, of Philadelphia.
[iii].Lake
Mohonk Conference, 1891, Proceedings, page 104, speech of Mr.
W.
Townsend, an Indian student from Carlisle.
[iv].Lake
Mohonk Conference, 1890, from a paper, "The Indian Health Question,"
by Dr. Martha M. Waldron.
[v].The
Problem of Indian Administration,
Lewis Meriam, editor; submitted to Secretary of the Interior Hubert
Work,
February 21, 1928, page 107.
[vi].Ibid,
page 376.
[vii].Ibid,
pages 292-293.
[viii].Ibid,
pages 351-2.
[ix].Ibid,
page 373.
[x].American
Indian Policy Review Commission, Final Report, Submitted to Congress,
May 17,
1977, Volume one of two volumes, page 81.
[xi].Ibid,
page 3, in a section paginated with page numbers in
parentheses.
[xii].Lake
Mohonk Conference, 1887, address of C.C. Painter.
[xiii].Senator
Dawes, Lake Mohonk Conference of Friends of the Indian, 1890,
Proceedings, page
84.
[xiv].The
Problem of Indian Administration,
Lewis Meriam, editor, 1928, page 317.
[xv].Ibid,
page 318.
[xvi].Most
of the food which is sold through centralized grocery stores is just as
unhealthy. We need to go back to
planting our own gardens, restoring our permaculture, and eating our
traditional Ahnishinahbæótjibway foods. The food supply available to us is
contaminated with preservatives, additives, and agricultural chemicals. We need to critically consider the extent of
our involvement in the Western European economic system--hoarding food
is not Ahnishinahbæótjibway.
[xvii].The
New Century Dictionary,
page 428, Op.
cit..
[xviii].The
Problem of Indian Administration,
page 14, Op. cit..
[xix].Ibid,
page 332.
[xx].Ibid,
page 382.
[xxi].If
the reader would like further information, one can begin with any U.S.
Government policy document on Indian education prior to 1920, chosen at
random
since the U.S. justifications were annually reiterated.
If one understands the meanings of the word
Indian in these documents, the policy was explicit.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |