Reflections
from the Ahnishinahbæótjibway (We, the People)
|

The
real issue in the standoff between the Mohawk Nation and
Canada/England is Sovereignty. The
Mohawk Nation, part of the ancient Six Nation confederacy, has been
asking for
Indo-European recognition of their Sovereignty as a Nation ever since
European
Nations withdrew recognition of the Mohawks after signing Treaties with
them. The Europeans recognized Mohawk
Sovereignty but their intentions were not honorable.
The Mohawks were a peaceful people and peaceful, egalitarian
Sovereign people cannot exist side-by-side with warlike Indo-European
piracy
and plunder empires—peaceful and harmonious ideas are subversive to
hierarchical societies and Hitler didn’t invent “the Final Solution.”
There
is another Canadian issue in the news that directly
relates to the refusal to recognize Mohawk Sovereignty that led to the
Euro-Canadian army’s invasion of the Mohawk Nation.
With the rejection of the Meech Lake Accord, the French-speaking
people of Quebec are once again talking about leaving the Canadian
Confederation. One of the strategies
which has been discussed to keep Quebec within the Confederation is
using the
Governor General to block Quebec’s moves toward “Sovereignty
association.” The Governor General is
appointed by and
responsible to the Queen of England; in spite of “repatriation of the
Constitution,” the Queen of England still holds the sovereignty of the
English-speaking European people in Canada.
The conflict between the French (most Catholic) Quebecois (whose
sovereignty
is held by the Pope of the Holy Roman Empire) and the English-speaking
Canadians (whose Sovereignty is held by the Queen and the
Protestant-Episcopal
Archbishop of Canterbury) has it roots deep in European history. This conflict has been reinforced over the
centuries by European wars and the ethnic violence which is embedded in
their
language, their culture, and in Indo-European traditions which are so
detached
from the real and natural world that virtually all Europeans cannot see
for
themselves what is real, what is man-made, and what is propaganda.
The
European people do not hold their own Sovereignty; their
ancestors lost it at least a thousand years ago, and some of them lost
it four
or five millennia ago. The Sovereignty
of European people has been held by a series of theocracies (alleging
separation of church and state is legerdemain—Crooked English). The Church/Royal property and slave
(“subject”) people are administered by an elite who is allowed to hold
enough
“wealth” to give them almost unquestioning allegiance to the system. Part of the way in which the Indo-European
hierarchies (including those under the sovereignty of the Queen of
England and
of the Pope) have deepened their control and expanded their territory
for six
thousand years is by disrupting the people on the lower levels of their
artificial hierarchies with factions and violence.
The courts, the police, and the rest of the hierarchial
infrastructure keep the oppressed people from either seeing clearly or
dealing
effectively with where their problems are really coming from: that’s
why they
are there. This kind of control
includes taking away whatever identity people do have, and manipulating
them
into Indo-European hierarchically controlled identities: “drunk,” “drug
addict,”
“gang member” “welfare recipient,” criminal,” “minority,” “our Indian,”
etc. Racial stereotypes are part of
these projected identities and Indo-European psychological warfare. T.V. violence reinforces the context of
these artificial, imposed identities.
If people do not know who they are, they can’t figure out the
world
around them, and they are predictable and under control, “programmed”
and
regimented into the identity that was created for them, owned by the
elite,
slaves. Both jails and United States
Government “Indian” boarding schools are part of the strategy of
stealing
people’s identity which as been refined by Indo-European hierarchial
slave-states over a period of 5,000 years.
If
a Euro-Canadian tries to say they are “independent from
England,” they should look at whose picture is on their money. England maintains control over virtually all
of her “former” colonies through their economic system, among other
ways. Land stolen from indigenous people
throughout
the world is still called “crown land.”
Prices for products coming from “former” colonies are controlled
in
Europe. Commonwealth territories are
administered by people trained in Europe, using Indo-European
bureaucratic
structures, Indo-European social infrastructures, and crooked
Indo-European
languages. The legitimate aboriginal
peoples’ title to land—all over the world—is not recognized by either
the Pope
or the Queen. This is one of the many
methods used to steal: others include crooked English, genocide, and
forced
education in boarding schools to take away Indigenous peoples’ identity
and
thus their knowledge of their Sovereignty; as well as their harmonious
egalitarian stewardship religions. Many
Indigenous people are forcibly starved [this is part of what ecological
destruction is about] into rigid hierarchical exploitive “religious”
world-views, for example Christian Manifest Destiny.
“My brother’s keeper” is abused as just another way of stealing
from Indigenous peoples.
Indo-Europeans
have subsisted without their own Sovereignty
for so long, that they do not understand what the Mohawks are talking
about. Hundreds of centuries of violent
hierarchical Indo-European history have obliterated almost every trace
of
personal Sovereignty for Indo-European people and their societies. The Indo-European hierarchial system is
designed so that Sovereign people, including the Mohawks will get
absolutely
nowhere talking to flunkies, lackeys and political hacks.
Part of the role of these high-level
subordinates is to maintain the power structure, absorb the
responsibility for
the Euro-Canadian and other Indo-European subordinates’ refusal to
recognize
Mohawk Sovereignty. Their subordinates
do not have Sovereignty, it has been beaten out of them by thousands of
years
of the same kind of violent repression that they are trying to do to
the
Mohawks, and so they do not understand what the Mohawks are talking
about.
Traditional
Algonquin society, including both the Mohawk
Nation and the Anishinabe Ojibway Nations, is egalitarian society. Every single member of all the Traditional
Algonquin societies held their own personal Sovereignty.
Indo-Europeans may hold their property “in
common” as a group of non-Sovereign people, and that’s why they pay
taxes up
the hierarchy. The Indigenous people,
including the Anishinabe Ojibway people, held their land jointly,
through the
Clans. The land is held jointly by
Sovereign people who cannot sell it.
Both the Anishinabe Ojibway Midewin and the Six Nations
Longhouse are a
part of this joint stewardship of the land by egalitarian Sovereign
people.
Both
the people of the Midewin and the people of the
Longhouse had writing which inherently recognized joint, Sovereign
stewardship
of the land by all of the People. Both
the Midewin and the Longhouse have had many of their sacred writings
stolen by
Indo-Europeans in the early 1900’s.
Bank robberies are good public relations for the Indo-European
monetary
system; Indo-Europeans realized that our writing was valuable enough
for
crooked people to steal. Also, but
ethnocentrically, they refuse to recognize its legitimacy as writing. Apparently the Queen of England is
cross-culturally illiterate; she only recognizes land titles she or her
predecessors had written in crooked English.
(Reading all of their invented land titles written in Crooked
English is
enough to make a person want to throw up.)
The Royal Families and Religious Sovereigns of Europe have been
isolated, fawned upon, and pampered for so long that maybe they can’t
see the
humanity of other people or feel the magnitude of the suffering created
in
their name and called “unique” all over the world.
The privileged class just underneath them on the hierarchy helps
to maintain the myths that their parasitic artificial class system
depends on;
it seems as though the only Sovereign people left in Europe are so
coddled by
pomp and ceremony that even they have lost sight of their roots as
human
beings.
Machiavelli,
in his cunning textbook for dirty politics, The
Prince, wrote about Sovereign people.
What he said was that Sovereign people were extremely dangerous
to an
hierarchial state because Sovereign ideas are infectious.
Just about every Indo-European political
figure since then has followed Machiavelli’s guidelines, and tried to
annihilate Sovereign people and their knowledge of the world. Mahatma Gandhi recognized this.
He wrote, “European democracy as it
functions today is deluded Fascism and Nazism.” The
Indo-Europeans who call themselves Canadians surrounding the
Mohawks with tanks, rockets, machine guns, and bombs—on Sovereign
Mohawk land—are
a crystal-clear example of this Indo-European/Canadian Hitler complex.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |