Reflections
from the Ahnishinahbæótjibway (We, the People)
|
Assistant Secretary for
Indian
Affairs
Ross O. Swimmer
Dear Mr.
Swimmer:
We
thank you for taking the time to talk with the press, and
to meet with us while you were in Minneapolis on July 12th. We also appreciate that, whatever you
personal feelings might be, in your present position as Assistant
Secretary you
are relatively powerless to influence procedural processes which the
United
States Government has established—for the specific purpose of
disenfranchising
Traditional Indian people.
We
are also quite aware that the Cherokee Nation made a
serious attempt to adapt to mainstream United States political/social
organization—and that the Cherokee Holocaust which followed was a
consequence
of the United States Government needing money to pay for the Louisiana
Purchase, as well as of back-room negotiations between the Federal
Government
and the State of Georgia. You talk
about “law”—and it seems that you are talking about “laws” passed by
the same
institutions that passed the Cherokee removal Act, rather than about
Traditional Indian Law.
We
are also aware that your apparent decision, as evidenced
by your biography, to look for “success” in the context of the dominant
society
is probably the consequence of your ancestors’ decision to turn away
from the
Pipe and from their identity as Traditional Indian people.
If the “Swimmer manuscripts” are from your
family, we do not need to say any more about “selling out.” We cannot condemn people for making whatever
decision they have made; we cannot know how they perceived the
circumstances. Our reason for bringing
this up is to note that you may not understand Traditional Indian
people, and
thus not fully understand the issues which we were trying to discuss
with you
on Tuesday.
The
“mess” in Red Lake is not Red Lake’s fault. You
should know that. The United States
Government unilaterally
abolished our Traditional Council of Chiefs.
We did not need to vote for our Chiefs: they were chosen by the
consensus of the people, and our government was more democratic [from
the Greek
words meaning “government of the people”] than the United States
Government can
ever hope to be. The Indian
Reorganization Act council and constitution that we have now is an
alien
European structure forced on us without our informed consent by the
United
States Government. To “disavow” this,
does not change the consequences of what has already happened, nor the
fact
that Red Lake present “government” [trust ultimately managed by the
United
States] is the one put into place by the BIA/United States
Government. The 90% unemployment rate
in Red Lake, and all of the accompanying social problems, are a direct
consequence of United States Government management of our resources,
the White
political/economic structure, the tax structure, and deals involving our
economic resources made between the United States Government and
certain
corporations. Stropping our people of
the power to do anything about the problems which are
destroying our
community (as planned), and then blaming us for those problems
may hold
some narrow kind of academic “logic,” but it defies common sense.
The
United States Government created the Tribal Courts, and
wrote the ordinances and rules of that court.
The United States Government created the Red Lake I.R.A.
Council, and
the Red Lake I.R.A. Constitution, and the laws/regulations under which
that
I.R.A. Council (with no separation of powers) can appoint
whomever it
pleases to the court. Telling us, the
Red Lake Indian people, that we are “responsible for [this] mess,” and
that the
only way that you will provide out of it is to give up more of our
sovereignty
through the Justice Department—how can we conclude anything but that
the Bureau
is out to destroy us?
We
realize that you cannot, probably, do much of anything in
your official capacity to help us. We
also understand that your term as Assistant Secretary is nearly up, and
that
you are not in good health—we send our condolences.
We also understand that some of what you said on Tuesday was
rather
narrowly constructed: when you said “I” it meant “myself personally in
the
capacities of my office,” rather than “the Bureau of Indian Affairs.” You used the White man’s slippery English
(for example, when you talked about the “tribe”), and you were evasive. Also, it seems that you lied a few times—and
we thought White men were the ones who lied.
You
claim Chieftainship.
A
legitimate Traditional Indian Chief would not eat when his
people are hungry. Yet, you ate steak
with fifty Bureaucrats; you should have gone to Franklin Avenue (the
Minneapolis Indian ghetto), and seen our people in the soup lines that
thousands of well-paid “Indian” bureaucrats in the Federal government
have
created with their policies. A legitimate
Traditional Indian Chief is not afraid to be among his people.
You
said that you “cannot help” us. But, what
you could do is provide us with information. If
we know more precisely what was happening
within the Bureau, and the structure that the Bureau has created, we
would have
a better chance of creating the decent community in Red Lake that our
people
deserve. We can use: organizational
charts of the Bureau; flow-diagrams of the decision-making process;
names and
addresses of the lobbyists and insiders with two hats who influence
Indian
policy; audits of Red Lake Indian trust accounts (which you may
not have
but which the Bureau certainly does); copies of all information
(including
psychological, sociological, anthropological, and medical studies)
which the
Bureau has on Red Lake, and any other information which you feel may be
helpful.
We
are also reminding you of your agreement to try to set up
a meeting between the grassroots Ojibway Indian people and Secretary
Hodel. We would like to meet with the
persons who formulate Indian policy as well.
Your policy of calling us “dissidents” and “poor losers [of
elections],”
and hoping that we will go away, is in its fourth generation of
twilight zone
thinking; reminiscent of “Death Valley Days.”
Traditional Indian people are here, and will remain here. If the U.S. Government’s policy-makers will
not meet with us, we will know that they have something to hide, and
are
probably afraid of discussing their policies with the grassroots
rank-and-file
Indians who those policies are designed to destroy.
Thank
you again for your time. We look forward
to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Sho-ne-ah-wub
Francis Blake, Jr.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |