Reflections
from the Ahnishinahbæótjibway (We, the People)
|
Swimmer: I spent an
hour with you-all already, so now you just get thirty more minutes.
Lawrence: We came
somewhat prepared, Mr. Swimmer. We’ve
got a little agenda, but actually there’s mainly one issue that we want
to
discuss. I think some of the things we
discussed this morning already, regarding our constitution, the tribal
constitutions, and what status we have with the BIA; and what the
Bureau can do
to enforce through the constitutions, enforce the tribal council in
this
regard. And, there’s some important
issues involved in civil rights, and we understand that form what we
heard this
morning that you have little to do to enforce the tribe to comply with
the
constitution. Is that what we heard
this morning?
Swimmer: That’s
right. Compliance with the tribal
constitution is within the authority of the tribal government, and the
process
that you have available. That
constitution does not bind the federal government, it binds the people
to the
tribe. And, whatever process there is,
whether it’s court, uh, administrative process, or wherever you go, to
get a
resolution out of this, within that constitution. It
should provide you with a direction, to go back to the court,
to go back to the tribal government, to go someplace else.
Lawrence: Well, we
tried that already. It doesn’t work on
our reservation. You’re probably aware
of that.
Swimmer: I know
you’ve tried and did not get satisfaction.
I don’t know that it doesn’t work.
Lawrence: I have a
question of information on the tribal government. We’ve
questioned the BIA, we’ve sued in federal court, we’ve got
denied tribal ... [sound of paper rustling] transfer payments from the
general
fund ...
Swimmer: Is there a
process in your constitution for recall?
Lawrence: Yes, there
is, but we’ve already went through recall, and had the petition denied
by the BIA. We had thirteen or fourteen
hundred
signatures, so I think that we’ve tried every measure that there was
available
to us.
Barlow: I’ll have
to have my memory refreshed. When was
that?
Cook: Here’s one
that we got from the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, saying that we had
a valid
petition, and then it was never acted upon, it was thrown in the
wastepaper
basket.
Barlow: You’ve got
to get him in there.
Cook: I already
asked him. And here’s what happened to
our head Hereditary Chief: once he ran against Roger, he was fired. Hereditary Chief, imagine that.
[Long
silence]
Lawrence: I guess
I’d like to know, Mr. Secretary, on what basis do you recognize Indian
tribes,
then. I guess is what you’ve got me
confused. Is it a contractual basis, is
it a contract, the constitution that is signed by the Assistant
Secretary.
Barlow: No.
Swimmer: No!
No. No contractual basis.
Indian tribes are recognized primarily
through the treaties that were signed, and through acts of Congress
that have
come down, and through court decisions.
They are freestanding, self-governing entities.
Uh, that is, state or federal laws. They
are subject only to the laws of the
federal government, generally speaking, and they retain the same powers
and
authorities that they have had from time immemorial.
They are not set up by us, they are not organized by us...
Cook: What!
Swimmer: We don’t
have any responsibility for them.
Lussier: That gets
me mad, that thing.
Lawrence: The Indian
Reorganization Act wasn’t imposed on the tribes?
Swimmer: The Indian
Reorganization Act (IRA) was a method of organizing tribal government. About a third of the tribes were organized
under IRS’s, and the rest of them—are not.
Barlow: But the
Bureau personnel put the constitutions together. I
was a superintendent before the ...
Swimmer: Bureau
personnel, uh, provided drafts of constitutions, provided drafts of,
uh,
provisions in those constitutions, and at one time I think played a
very big
role in how those constitutions would come about. And
that’s a role which I disavow today, and I think that we
should be out of it. I would like to take
us completely out of having anything to do with tribal constitutions.
Cook: Could we
give you background on our tribal constitution?
Swimmer: Well, I
think you just did.
Cook: WE ... I
think I told you this morning that our constitution was placed on the
reservation by fraud, by the federal government, think we have a letter
from
the Commissioner to the Secretary of the Interior stating that the
people are
fierce in Red Lake against organizing under the Indian Reorganization
Act
(IRA), ... they told them, “dare not let the people know that they are
approving this document.” Here’s a copy
of the actual vote to accept the IRA, 434 people. And
then, when we ask to even amend our constitution, this is
what we get! The government lied to the
people saying that they were revising our Chief’s council when in fact
they
were doing away with the Chiefs Council and putting an Indian
Reorganization
Act constitution on our reservation by fraud!
The people had no input other than Robinson, and two other
people came to
the reservation, walked into the Chief’s meeting, and said, “you have
no more
government.” And since that day, we
have had nothing but a dictatorship form of government on the
Reservation by
Roger Jourdain—hand-picked by the Bureau to do us in.
Barlow: According
to this, you had 456 people cast ballots, 443 voted in favor of the
constitution.
Cook: And then,
we have a thousand and thirty-six signatures asking to amend the
constitution,
and it was thrown in the wastepaper basket.
Swimmer: Well, I
don’t know. What do you want?
[Inaudible]
... other
than remedy in the courts ...
Cook: What can
the Department of the Interior do for the Red Lake Band of Chippewa
Indians—we
have no government.
Swimmer: Well, we
don’t see it that way.
Cook: Well, you’re
recognizing eleven people that are not representing anybody but
themselves.
Swimmer: They
wouldn’t be recognized if they weren’t elected, duly elected ...
Cook: By fraud!
Swimmer: Well, I
know.
Lawrence: How were
they elected pursuant to what? If we don’t
recognize their constitution as having efficacy.
Swimmer: It
does. The constitution is your
constitution.
Lawrence: And, they
can violate it whenever they choose, the council ...
Swimmer: You’ve got
provisions in the constitution, that ...
Lawrence: What is
the process for amending the constitution?
[Silence]
Lussier:
Superintendent?
Swimmer: By
referendum and recall.
Lawrence: And they
can violate it whenever they choose, the council and Jourdain.
Swimmer: Well, it’s
in there.
Cook: Is
it? Where is it? All
it says, “there shall be a, uh, deal for
referendum and recall,” but they haven’t done that—there ain’t no
tribal
ordinance allowing that.
Swimmer: Upon
receipt of a petition with twenty-five percent of the eligible voters.
Cook: Well,
there it is.
Swimmer: ... and
the affirmative vote of eight members of the tribal council, any
enacted or
proposed resolution or ordinance shall be submitted to a referendum of
the
eligible voters.
Cook: Well,
there it is—we had one thousand thirty-six signatures, and they
signatures were
validated by [the] FBI. Morris Babbey
sent a letter to Roger saying he was mandated by the constitution to
hold this
election—where is it? What do we do? Were do we go? To
Roger’s appointed court officials, where if they hear our case,
they would be fired the next day?
Swimmer: Well, at
this time that is the only place that you have to go.
Lussier: Well, I’m
only going to say one thing. I ain’t
going to say very much, now. My opinion
is, my friend, that you are letting me down.
Look at the names on that constitution.
(Continued July 27, 1988)
Swimmer: I don’t
run your tribal government, and I’m not going to run your tribal
government.
Lussier: That isn’t
the point.
Swimmer: And, I’m
not going to implement your constitution.
You have to implement your constitution.
Lawrence: We did!
Swimmer: Now, you
tell me that you don’t want to go to court, or when you do something on
your
constitution, they ignore it.
Lawrence: What court
do we go to? Where do we go?
It’s just as simple as that.
Cook: What
court? We’ll go to court.
Which court?
Swimmer: Well, I
presume that the C.F.R. Court, unless you have other ...
Lawrence: You know,
you just contracted it out to Roger. In
spite of all these violations of civil rights, that’s the tribal court.
Swimmer: Yes, it’s tribal
court.
Lawrence: So, where
do we take it?
Swimmer: Tribal
court.
Lawrence: But, the
tribal court said, “you don’t bring it in here.”
Cook: That they
have no authority over our constitution.
We got that in writing. Where do
we go?
Swimmer: That’s it.
Those are your remedies. You don’t
have any remedies, is what you’re
saying to me.
[Laughter]
Lawrence: OK.
Swimmer: That’s
right.
Lawrence: So, we can
do nothing about it.
Swimmer: That’s
right.
Lawrence: So, what
was the purpose of the Constitution that was signed by the
Superintendent, or
Area Director, or whoever ...
Swimmer: Simply
acknowledging that the Tribe has a constitution.
Cook: Where
would you go to authorize to overthrow our government, that is not
working?
Swimmer: Where
would I go?
Cook: Yeah, what
would you do?
Swimmer: If you
engage in civil disobedience, you’d go to FBI, or the tribal court, or
to, uh,
whoever’s the police on the reservation.
Lawrence: Well, OK,
I guess we’ve been through the process.
But, if you can’t do anything, why don’t you support us, and
introduce
some legislation in the Congress so that something can be done. We have a resolution here.
Swimmer: You have
the absolute right to introduce, to go to Congress to do whatever you
want to
do.
Lawrence: Well, why
don’t you support us?
Swimmer: No.
Cook: Why not?
Swimmer: I will not
support one side against the other.
Cook: That’s
what you’re doing, now.
Swimmer: No. You’re
telling me that the present government was elected by an overwhelming
majority
of the people, and you’re asking me to disavow that ...
Cook: Roger was
elected by—he won by ten votes.
Swimmer: Well, then
by ten votes. Well, you’re asking me to
ignore those ten people, and support you ten people.
Lawrence: OK, but,
we have a compact, or a contract with the tribal government. We’re saying, here’s the authorities we give
you in this constitution. They’re
ignoring many of them. They don’t
release financial statements. They
don’t release minutes of the meeting.
They won’t let us attend meetings. They don’t ...
Swimmer: So, what
would you propose that I could do?
Cook: Where
would we take the constitution?
Lawrence: Either
tell the tribe to comply with the constitution, or don’t contract with
them.
Cook: Withdraw
recognition ...
Lussier: You don’t
even need to do that. All you need to
do is say, “we don’t want to contract with you until you do [comply
with the
constitution]. Until you do, we’ll
deliver the services ourselves. You
have the delivery system. This is what
this resolution talks about, and we’re going to try ...
Swimmer: We have an
act of Congress that says that this is not grounds for, uh,
disapproving a
constitution.
Cook: Where
would we take you and the Secretary of the Interior to court?
Swimmer: The
secretary does not provide grounds ...
Lawrence: So,
there’s procedures in there that, you’ve got to comply with community
support,
and we can show a lot of community support for the provision of
services ...
Swimmer: All that
means is that we have to let them know that they’re not complying with
it, but
that doesn’t give us grounds to withdraw contracts.
Lawrence: In view of
the fact that they have denied civil rights, and you still went ahead
and
approved contracts with them, and
Swimmer: I don’t
know that they denied civil rights.
Lawrence: We have
said things, and there have been court cases, and all kinds of things
that ...
Swimmer: I’m not a
judge, and I’m not hearing the other side of this.
You know, you don’t have Roger sitting at the table here,
telling
me all of the good things that he has done.
Lawrence: He could
have come down. We didn’t exclude him.
Swimmer: Well, I’m
just telling you that I’m not in a position to be a hearing officer, to
determine whether you’re right, or he’s right.
I’m saying that you have a process to go through, to do that.
Lawrence: OK, you
are saying that you will not support us on this legislation. Are you going to go against ...
Swimmer: I don’t
know. I haven’t seen the legislation, I
don’t know what you’re politicking. If
this is legislation against your current tribal government, no!
Lawrence: This is
legislation not to contract with them on F.Y.’89 until they comply with
the
constitution.
Swimmer: No, I
won’t support that, any more than I would support ...
Lussier: Stop all
the money, stop all the money, boys! No
pay ...
Swimmer: But,
that’s just a backing away of the bureau.
And then when you take over, I’d stop all of the money from you.
Lawrence: No,
because we will comply with the constitution.
Swimmer: But, why
would we want to do that?
Lawrence: Because
all we want is someone to enforce the constitution.
We can’t enforce it.
Swimmer: So, you
want me to enforce the constitution by trying to cut off the right of
the tribe
to contract with the Bureau.
Cook: Yeah.
Swimmer: Well, what
happens in the next election? Do you
want me to do the same thing to the next people?
Lawrence: Well, if
they violate the constitution, yeah.
Swimmer: So, every
time the constitution gets violated, I withdraw the money.
Lawrence: So, we
have some means of having it enforced.
Swimmer: But, I get
to determine whether it’s been violated, or do you get to determine ...
Lawrence: No, the
court will do it, but give us a ...
Swimmer: So, but
you say, the court’s no good—you don’t want to use the court.
Lawrence: The Tribal
Court’s no good ...
Swimmer: Well, what
court would be good?
Lawrence: We’ll go
to Federal curt.
Swimmer: As long as
you get the right decision—it would be a good court?
Lawrence: You
haven’t given us a right decision. You
haven’t even given us access to Federal court, except for habeas
corpus
...
Swimmer: Well,
that’s exactly what we’re attempting to do, and that’s the only remedy
that we
can offer to you, and I’m not sure that congress will go along with
that
remedy.
Lawrence: Well,
we’re going to try it, whether you help us or not.
Swimmer: That’s
fine. Our position is, that you should
have a forum, to be able to go to, and to redress a grievance on civil
rights. And if the tribal court is
unable to provide that forum, we are proposing legislation to allow you
to go
to federal court.
Cook: Well, in
the meantime, ...
Swimmer: And, I
don’t think that you can ask for more than that.
Cook: In the
meantime, what do we do?
Swimmer: In the
meantime, there isn’t a thing that you can ask for.
In the meantime, you do what every other tribe does, and that’s
just wait.
Lussier: Wait, wait
forever, is that it?
Swimmer: That’s
right. We don’t have any other tools
available to us, to intervene in this tribe, and make anybody do
anything.
Lussier: But two
million dollars is coming into Red Lake through the BIA, and then—you
don’t
have control of the money that they get?
Cook: How did
Robinson and an three-man team come in and do away with our Chiefs
council,
tell me that.
Swimmer: I don’t
know.
Cook: Well—I
mean, how? You should know.
Blake: What you’re
saying, then, is Congress is responsible for this whole mess, the
United States
Congress.
Swimmer: What
mess?
Blake: This mess
that we’ve got here.
Swimmer: Red Lake’s
mess?
Blake: This 90%
unemployment ...
Swimmer: Red Lake
is responsible for your mess.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |