Reflections
from the Ahnishinahbæótjibway (We, the People)
|

Red Lake Sawmill Court Case
by Francis Blake
NEWS correspondent
UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR
THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Dockets Number 85-5272 and 97-5188. (Red
Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Red
Lake, Minnesota, and Roger A. Jourdain, Chairman, Red Lake, Minnesota, v.
Earl J. Barlow, Area Director, Minneapolis Area Office and Rex Mayotte,
Superintendent, Red Lake Agency, Bureau of Indian Affairs, United
States
Department of the Interior, Donald Hodel, Secretary of Interior, U.S.
Department of Interior.)
Filed on May 2,
1988, the United States Court of Appeals ruled on the Red Lake Tribal
Council’s
complaint of August 3, 1983 to transfer $800,000 from the “Sawmill
Account”
[U.S. Trust Account No. 14X7285] to the operating budget of the Red
Lake Tribal
Council. The Court rules to “require
the Secretary [of the Interior] to determine the viability of a forest
products
business on the Red Lake Reservation,” in “an informal decision-making
process.” If the Secretary of the
Interior feels that this $800,000 can be spent on forestry on Red Lake
Reservation, then this money will stay under the control of the United
States
Government, in the “sawmill account.”
Approximately
11.9 trillion dollars ($11,900,000,000,000.00)
worth of timber has been taken off of the Red Lake Indian land which
the Red
Lake Indian Nation kept under the 1863 Treaty (see map).
The United States Government has, under
White European law, claimed Trusteeship over Indian people since 1824,
explaining,
“But now take a community that is not free ... a prison, an orphan
asylum, a
regiment of soldiers. That is not
self-governing; that is under control; that is a ward of the people.
... That
is precisely the position which we are in with reference to the Indians. They are under control. They
are our wards. They are not free, not
self-governing.” Under this trusteeship,
the $11.9 trillion
which should be in the Red Lake Indian forest account has shrunk to
$800,000. According to the original
complaint filed by
the “Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, Red Lake, Minnesota, and Roger
A.
Jourdain, Chairman, Red Lake, Minnesota,” this $800,000 trust account
includes
“tribal income derived from the sale and operation of tribal resources.”
This
suit was filed by “Tribal Attorneys” Edwards, Edwards and
Bodin of Duluth. Tribal Attorneys are
“duly appointed” and approved by the Secretary of the Interior. Under White United States law, nobody can be
sued twice for the same thing. This
suit, along with all the cases heard by the United States Court of
Indian
Claims, is orchestrated, by the United States Government and the
attorneys
which the U.S. approves “for” Indian tribes, to protect the United
States from
future lawsuits over the liabilities which the U.S. Government owes
Indian
people: reparations, payment for land and resources stolen, damages,
compensation for genocide and forced acculturation.
The present case is also a red herring to divert public
attention
from the legitimate claims of Indian people.
The
Act of May 18, 1916 (39 Stat. 123, 137-8), amended on
August 3, 1956 and again on August 28, 1958, used White law to “create
a forest
reserve” out of a forest which had already existed for hundreds of
thousands of
years on sovereign Red Lake Indian land.
This Act, as amended, gives the Secretary of the Interior a
blank check
to administer our forest and operate the Red Lake Sawmill.
Section 9 of this Act reads, “... The Red
Lake Indian Forest shall be administered by the Secretary of the
Interior in
accordance with principles of scientific forestry that will encourage
the
production of successive timber crops for the benefit of the Indians of
the Red
Lake Band, and he is hereby authorized to harvest, sell and manufacture
such
marketable timber from any tribal lands within the Red lake Indian
Reservation
as he may deem to be advisable and, if the timber is the growth of Red
Lake
Indian Forest, in keeping with foregoing principles, ... (b) to
establish
nurseries and otherwise provide for the reforestation of said lands,
and to
construct sawmills and other facilities for the manufacture into
marketable
products of the timber harvested from said lands ... and (e) to employ
such
persons and use such means as he may find necessary to carry out the
provisions
of the foregoing provisions. Any
proceeds derived from sales of timber or timber products under this
paragraph
may be expended in payment of the expenses of any of the activities
authorized
by this paragraph, including construction expenses.”
According
to the Solicitor’s opinion (July 31, 1951), “Under
a provision in an annual appropriation act which states, without
limitation or
exception, that tribal funds may be advanced to Indian tribes for ‘such
purposes as may be designated by the governing body of the particular
tribe
involved and approved by the Secretary,’ it is legally permissible for
the
tribe, with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, to use
the net
proceeds from the operation of a tribal
sawmill for the purpose of meeting supervisory and scaling costs
incurred in
the sale of reservation timber ... in connection with the sale of
cordwood and
cedar from Little Pine Island.” [The
money from the Little Pine Island timber has disappeared.]
In
1958, the Bureau of Indian Affairs refused to recognize
the Red Lake Tribal Council, and the 1958 Amendment to the Forestry Act
read
that the Secretary of the Interior could do whatever he wanted to Red
Lake
Indian Forests, “without Tribal Consent,” “because there was no Tribal
Council.” Under these White laws, the
United States Government can do whatever they want to do what they
haven’t
already destroyed of the Red Lake Indian Nation’s forests, without our
consent. Secretary of the Interior
Douglas McKay explained the U.S. Government’s attitude about “consent”
in 1955,
“In short, it seems to me that the principle of Indian ‘consent’ ...
has most
serious Constitutional implications... I believe it would be extremely
dangerous.” The Forestry Act openly
violates Indian human and civil rights, as well as International Law. Instead of talking about this, the Tribal
Council has disenfranchised ourselves and our future generations, and
participated in an orchestrated suit about $800,000 which is already
spent.
The
1916 Act as amended required the Secretary of the
Interior to administer the Red Lake Indian forests “for the benefit of
the
Indians of the Red Lake Band.”
According to Tribal Council Resolution 236-82, during the six
months
between October 1,1 979 and March 31, 180, the operating loss of the
Red Lake
Mill under the administration of the Secretary of the Interior was
$314,752.62. [According to the
Department of the Interior, which published an account for Congress on
June 24,
1958, the balance of the Account on January 31, 1958 was $1,455,440.29.] The Tribal Council requested a full audit of
U.S. Trust Account No. 14X7285, the “sawmill account,” but the U.S.
Government
would not provide it. Using the Freedom
of Information Act, this reporter and other members of the Red Lake
Indian
community have also requested accounting of the four “U.S. Trust
Accounts”
[including a second sawmill account, No. 14X7785] of Red Lake Indian
peoples’
money held by the U.S. Treasury under White law. The
Bureau of Indian Affairs Trust Office would not provide
accounts of these trust funds to enrolled members of the Red Lake Band
and
descendants of the signers of the Treaty (who the money belongs to),
claiming
that “it would take too many man-hours,” [the B.I.A. has all the Trust
Accounts
computerized], and then claiming that the Privacy Act prevented release
of the
information. Whose privacy does hiding
how $11.9 trillion disappeared protect?
On
May 30, 1985, Judge Miles Lord found in favor of the “Red
Lake Band of Chippewa Indians,” ruling that $127,788.61 should be
transferred
to the control of the Tribal Council.
The Tribal Council accepted this $127,788.61 payment instead of
the
$800,000 they sued for—and instead of the actual $11.9 trillion owned,
and
spent the money. The United States
Government Department of the Interior appealed the decision. Among their assertions was that the
“Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity prevents the Red Lake Indians from
suing the
United States Government.” The
Sovereignty of the Red Lake Indian Nation was not considered. According to the defense, release of Red
Lake Indian Money from the Sawmill Trust Fund “would expend itself on
the
public treasury,” although [they write two pages later], “the United
States
merely holds the money for the beneficial owners, here, the Red Lake
Indians.” The U.S. Government also said
that the only way that they would even consider releasing the Sawmill
Trust
funds would be as a per-capita payment [about $106 per person]. The Tribal Council requested transfer of the
funds to Account No. 14X7284, which “is the general fund which the
Tribal Council
uses for administrative purposes.
Although the Bureau of Indian Affairs must approve the release
of funds
from this account, this approval is essentially pro forma ...
and
pursuant to the Tribal Council’s annual budget. The
money is paid to the Tribal Council directly ...”
If
this court case was legitimately in the interests of the
Red Lake Indian people, the case would be well-publicized on Red Lake
Indian
Reservation, ad the Tribal Council would be calling on the Red Lake
Indian
people to back them up in court. The
copy of the court proceedings which the Ojibwe News obtained
had
fourteen pages of the Tribal Council’s exhibits missing.

Map
of Red Lake reservation published in Annual Report of the Commissioner of
Indian Affairs, 1888

1988 aerial photo of
clearcut logging at Red Lake
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |